Charter schools ARE public schools. These public schools are founded by highly skilled and passionate educators who care deeply about public education. The fact that charter schools are not unionized and do not contribute to political campaigns does not negate this reality.
In the Councilor’s most recent letter he goes on to reference a set of unrealistic cost estimates from a poorly developed and incomplete study. Let’s be honest, these materials were created as a means to provide political cover for the legislative majority’s choice to reject $46 million in federal funding for public schools. This is a common tactic and one used by charter school opponents in 2014 at the behest of powerful special interest groups. At that time charter school opponents spread similarly ludicrous enrollment projections and history has shown those projections to be off by nearly 3,000 students!
As a practical matter the federal funding that the Councilor opposes would help to improve public education and increase options for those students who are most in need. Under the terms of the federal award, funding would be prioritized for programs seeking to serve New Hampshire’s economically and educationally disadvantaged students by awarding up to $1.5 million to school districts and independent charter schools seeking to serve these populations. Additional funding would be available for the expansion or replication of high-quality programs.
Two examples of programs seeking to expand are Ledyard Charter School and PACE Career Academy. Both schools serve high rates of economically and educationally disadvantaged students by offering an alternative public education option and increased social and emotional supports. These public schools are supported by their local school districts because districts understand the benefit that these schools provide for their students and the school district.